Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ovenbird's avatar

Mary Oliver is amazing. One of my fave poets.

Steersman's avatar

Phetasy: The Supreme Court has been hearing arguments about whether boys and girls are different from each other. A very important question that no one thought to ask for 300,000 years of human history. BECAUSE IT’S STUPID!

👍 "STUPID", indeed. Even the birds & the bees know the difference, though there are, apparently, some gay birds, of one sex or another, floating about so it's hardly universal.

But that is maybe an artifact of "civilization" -- such as it is in the year of our lord 2026; how time flies ... -- and the fact that civilizations are more or less based on laws -- Hamurabi and Moses' Ten Commandments going back at least 3 to 5 thousand years.

But laws require precise definitions for the categories they rely on to be able to adjudicate competing claims based on supposed membership in them. Whence Matt Walsh's infamous documentary on that age-old question -- one that has confounded philosophers, pundits, politicians, and philanderers from time immemorial -- "What is a woman?" My own kick at that particular kitty:

https://humanuseofhumanbeings.substack.com/p/what-is-a-woman

But the problem is compounded by the many feminists -- zealots in many cases -- who refuse or are congenitaly incapable of offering any sort of a definition for the category that holds water and that is of any use at all in the practical matters that are the bailiwick of lawyers, at least those worth their salt. The upshot of which is the many feminists and transgender ideologues who insist that men and women are any who say they "identify as" such. Which has to qualify as "barking (mad)" as UK feminist philosopher Kathleen Stock -- author of "Material Girls", highly recommended -- once succinctly put it.

No posts

Ready for more?